Back to Research Home
wsrUSD

wsrUSD

$1.0991
Wrapped Savings rUSD

Wrapped srUSD — a savings token compounding the rUSD reserve’s yield every block.

Yield-bearing stable Available on
Ethereum
Ethereum
Monad
Monad
Pharos
Pharos
+18
Issued by Reservoir Protocol
Market cap
$108M ▲ +96.12% 30d
AUM
$109M
APY
6.00%
Backing
1.00×
Is there another asset you’d like us to cover? Request a Report
Overview Portfolio Exposure Yield & Equity Mint/Redeem Bridging Listings Due Diligence

What is wsrUSD?

wsrUSD — Wrapped Savings rUSD — is the transferable savings token of Reservoir Protocol’s dollar stack. rUSD, srUSD and wsrUSD are issued natively on Ethereum and made available on other chains as LayerZero omnichain tokens. The base token, rUSD, is a stablecoin minted and redeemed at par against a conservatively-managed reserve. Saving rUSD issues srUSD, which earns a governance-set interest rate that accrues daily; wsrUSD wraps that position into a fee-free token whose value compounds every block — the composable form used as collateral across lending markets.

This report looks through the wrapper to the reserve that ultimately backs every wsrUSD: a balance sheet of assets against the redeemable rUSD / srUSD / wsrUSD claims, the yield the reserve earns and distributes (the source of the savings rate), where it is deployed across chains and protocols, the collateral those positions are exposed to, and the borrowers on the other side of each market. Every figure is projected from the latest on-chain snapshot.

Token family · outstanding claims on the reserve
R
rUSD
$307.11K
base dollar · minted & redeemed at par
S
srUSD
$620.16K
savings rUSD · earns the savings rate
S
wsrUSD Main
$108.46M
wrapped srUSD · transferable, used as collateral
Key facts
Type Yield-bearing stableYield Per-block accrual
Issuer
Reservoir Protocol
Issued on
Ethereum
Bridged to
Sei · Monad · Pharos · via LayerZero OFT
Reserve assets
$109M
on-chain lending & yield positions
Redeemable claims
$109M
rUSD · srUSD · wsrUSD
wsrUSD APY
6.00%
Reserve weighted APY
7.38%
Borrowers
201
across rUSD-backed markets
On-chain reads + Reservoir analytics

Market Cap

$108.46M

$0$50M$100M$150MApr 19May 27Jul 5Aug 16Sep 22
Apr 19 Market Cap $158.46M

Price

$1.0991

$1.0800$1.0900$1.1000Apr 19May 27Jul 5Aug 16Sep 22
Apr 19 Price $1.0764

Portfolio

How the reserve is composed and deployed — balance sheet, positions, distribution, and history.

Balance Sheet

Managed assets against redeemable claims — what the reserve holds versus what depositors can redeem.

Assets · what we hold
$109.5M
earns 7.38%
  • Vault Deposits $109.5M 100%
Liabilities · redeemable claims
$109.38M
redeemable @ par
  • wsrUSD · wrapped savings $108.46M 99%
  • srUSD · savings $620.16K 1%
  • rUSD · base dollar $307.11K 0%
Total assets $109.5M
VS
Total claims $109.38M
→
Backing ratio 100.1%
Assets are the deployed-portfolio snapshot, split by position type; claims are the wsrUSD/srUSD/rUSD market values from the reserve's mint/redeem accounting. The portfolio snapshot may not capture every backing source (PSM liquidity, idle or bridge balances), so the ratio is indicative, not a full attestation.

Positions

What backs the reserve, grouped by position type.

Vault Deposits 13 $109.5M 100.0%
Position
Underlying
Chain
Protocol
Value
APY
Share
Dolomite
Dolomite
USD1
USD1
USD1
USD1
Ethereum
Ethereum
Ethereum
Dolomite
Dolomite
Dolomite
$33.00M
7.59% Supply APY 2.41% Rewards APY 5.18% Net APY 7.59%
30.14%
Curvance
Curvance
USDC (wsrUSD market)
USDC
USDC
USDC
Monad
Monad
Monad
Curvance
Curvance
Curvance
$31.21M
6.29% Supply APY 4.27% Rewards APY 2.02% Net APY 6.29%
28.50%
Curvance
Curvance
AUSD (wsrUSD market)
AUSD
AUSD
AUSD
Monad
Monad
Monad
Curvance
Curvance
Curvance
$19.20M
6.23% Supply APY 4.21% Rewards APY 2.02% Net APY 6.23%
17.54%
Curvance
Curvance
USDC (aguaUSDCgc market)
USDC
USDC
USDC
Monad
Monad
Monad
Curvance
Curvance
Curvance
$6.99M
9.55% Supply APY 6.94% Rewards APY 2.61% Net APY 9.55%
6.39%
Sentora
Sentora
Sentora PRIME
PYUSD
PYUSD
PYUSD
Ethereum
Ethereum
Ethereum
Morpho
Morpho
Morpho
$3.97M
6.78% Supply APY 4.08% Rewards APY 2.70% Net APY 6.78%
3.63%
Morpho
Morpho
Rockaway USDC
USDC
USDC
USDC
Pharos
Pharos
Pharos
Morpho
Morpho
Morpho
$3.90M
13.14% Supply APY 4.27% Rewards APY 8.87% Net APY 13.14%
3.56%
Aave
Aave
USDC
USDC
USDC
USDC
Monad
Monad
Monad
Aave
Aave
Aave
$2.70M
11.95% Supply APY 5.66% Rewards APY 6.29% Net APY 11.95%
2.46%
Aave
Aave
GHO (Plasma)
GHO
GHO
GHO
Plasma
Plasma
Plasma
Aave
Aave
Aave
$2.32M
6.77% Supply APY 2.99% Rewards APY 3.78% Net APY 6.77%
2.12%
Reservoir
Reservoir
Agua Global Carry Vault
USDC
USDC
USDC
Ethereum
Ethereum
Ethereum
Reservoir
Reservoir
Reservoir
$2.00M
10.00% Native APY 10.00%
1.83%
Steakhouse Financial
Steakhouse Financial
Steakhouse Prime USDC
USDC
USDC
USDC
Ethereum
Ethereum
Ethereum
Morpho
Morpho
Morpho
$1.77M
4.51% Supply APY 4.51%
1.62%
Aave
Aave
GHO (Monad)
GHO
GHO
GHO
Monad
Monad
Monad
Aave
Aave
Aave
$1.00M
9.17% Supply APY 2.88% Rewards APY 6.29% Net APY 9.17%
0.91%
Curvance
Curvance
USDC (savUSD market)
USDC
USDC
USDC
Monad
Monad
Monad
Curvance
Curvance
Curvance
$776.64K
7.87% Supply APY 5.85% Rewards APY 2.02% Net APY 7.87%
0.71%
Curvance
Curvance
AUSD (savUSD market)
AUSD
AUSD
AUSD
Monad
Monad
Monad
Curvance
Curvance
Curvance
$659.60K
8.19% Supply APY 6.17% Rewards APY 2.02% Net APY 8.19%
0.60%

Distribution

Where the reserve is deployed, by share of portfolio value.

By Chain
Monad 57.1% Ethereum 37.2% Other (2) 5.7%
  • Monad 57.1%
  • Ethereum 37.2%
  • Other (2) 5.7%
By Protocol
Curvance 53.7% Dolomite 30.1% Morpho 8.8% Other (2) 7.3%
  • Curvance 53.7%
  • Dolomite 30.1%
  • Morpho 8.8%
  • Other (2) 7.3%

Concentration

How concentrated the deployment is — across protocols, and across the assets backing the reserve.

Protocol Concentration
Diversified · HHI below 1,500Moderately concentrated · HHI 1,500 – 2,500Highly concentrated · HHI above 2,500Highly concentrated · HHI above 2,5001,5002,500010,0003,906concentrated
Effective protocols How many equal-size protocols would match this concentration score (10,000 ÷ score). A lower count means more of the value sits with a few large protocols.
2.6
Largest protocol
Curvance · 53.7%

How the reserve's deployed value is spread across protocols — fewer venues holding more of the value pushes the score up.

Asset Concentration
Diversified · HHI below 1,500Moderately concentrated · HHI 1,500 – 2,500Highly concentrated · HHI above 2,500Highly concentrated · HHI above 2,5001,5002,500010,0003,289concentrated
Effective assets How many equal-size assets would match this concentration score (10,000 ÷ score). A lower count means more of the value sits with a few large assets.
3.0
Largest asset
USDC · 45.1%

How the assets backing the reserve are distributed — heavier reliance on a single underlying pushes the score up.

Reading the gauges. Each gauge scores concentration: everything in one holding scores 10,000, ten equal holdings score 1,000. Shares are squared, so a few big positions dominate the score. The "effective" count is how many equal-sized holdings would score the same (10,000 ÷ score). The method is the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI); bands follow US antitrust thresholds:

  • Below 1,500 diversified
  • 1,500 – 2,500 moderately concentrated
  • Above 2,500 highly concentrated

Portfolio Over Time

Cumulative portfolio value, stacked by position. Hover a snapshot for the breakdown.

Drag to pan the full history
$0$50.0M$100.0M$150.0MApr 19May 10May 31Jun 21Jul 14Aug 6Sep 22
Apr 19 $160.73M Claim $160.53M RLUSD $66.73M · 41.5%PYUSD $37.22M · 23.2%Steakhouse USDC $35.87M · 22.3%Steakhouse Prime Instant V2 (Base) $7.00M · 4.4%Grove x Steakhouse High Yield AUSD $6.00M · 3.7%GHO $4.57M · 2.8%Steakhouse Prime USDC $3.00M · 1.9%USDC $296K · 0.2%Steakhouse RUSD $53K · 0.0%USDT $2K · 0.0%GHO (Plasma) $67 · 0.0%

The dashed line is the outstanding claim. A book below it in the early history is the engine still catching up to the asset's on-chain positions — historical coverage, not under-collateralization — and closes as adapters land; it is only there in the asset's early days.

Wallets

The protocol wallets that hold the reserve’s positions, with total holdings on each chain.

Holder
Chains
Type
Signing Threshold
0x289C…671c
Monad
Monad
Ethereum
Ethereum
Pharos
Pharos
EoA
—
8
$99.71M
0x3063…BD65
Monad
Monad
Plasma
Plasma
Ethereum
Ethereum
EoA
—
4
$8.02M
0x6507…b0dd
Ethereum
Ethereum
Contract — RedeemBuffer adapter
—
1
$1.77M

Exposure

What the reserve is exposed to — collateral, asset flow, and the borrowers on the other side.

Collateral Exposure

Portfolio exposure to each collateral asset, across every protocol and chain. Doesn’t include the direct holdings or unborrowed reserve.

wsrUSD · $48.96M · 57.77%WLFI · $7.1M · 8.37%aguaUSDCgc · $6.14M · 7.25%USDC · $3.72M · 4.39%USD1 · $3.62M · 4.27%WLFIcx · $3.03M · 3.57%PRIME · $2.89M · 3.41%WETH · $1.58M · 1.86%syrupUSDC · $1.45M · 1.71%savUSD · $1.3M · 1.53%cbBTC · $1.22M · 1.44%syrupUSDT · $1.18M · 1.40%PT-AUSD-8OCT2026 · $1.04M · 1.22%Other (11) · $1.53M · 1.81%$84.76Mexposure
Assets
24
Chains
3
Protocols
4
Asset
Chains
Protocol
Exposure
Share
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
Monad
Monad
Ethereum
Ethereum
Curvance
Curvance
Dolomite
Dolomite
$48.96M
57.77%
WLFI
WLFI
WLFI
Ethereum
Ethereum
Dolomite
Dolomite
$7.1M
8.37%
aguaUSDCgc
aguaUSDCgc
aguaUSDCgc
Monad
Monad
Curvance
Curvance
$6.14M
7.25%
USDC
USDC
USDC
Ethereum
Ethereum
Dolomite
Dolomite
$3.72M
4.39%
USD1
USD1
USD1
Ethereum
Ethereum
Dolomite
Dolomite
$3.62M
4.27%
WLFIcx
WLFIcx
WLFIcx
Ethereum
Ethereum
Dolomite
Dolomite
$3.03M
3.57%
PRIME
PRIME
PRIME
Ethereum
Ethereum
Morpho
Morpho
$2.89M
3.41%
WETH
WETH
WETH
Ethereum
Ethereum
Dolomite
Dolomite
Morpho
Morpho
$1.58M
1.86%
syrupUSDC
syrupUSDC
syrupUSDC
Monad
Monad
Aave
Aave
$1.45M
1.71%
savUSD
savUSD
savUSD
Monad
Monad
Curvance
Curvance
$1.3M
1.53%
cbBTC
cbBTC
cbBTC
Ethereum
Ethereum
Morpho
Morpho
$1.22M
1.44%
syrupUSDT
syrupUSDT
syrupUSDT
Plasma
Plasma
Aave
Aave
$1.18M
1.40%
AUSD
Pendle
PT-AUSD-8OCT2026
Monad
Monad
Aave
Aave
$1.04M
1.22%

Asset Flow

From each underlying asset, through the positions holding it, to the collateral third-party borrowers post against it. That final column is where a default lands: the collateral that would have to clear for the reserve to be made whole.

Drag to pan the full flow
AssetPositionBorrowerCollateral exposure
GHO $3.32MGHO (Plasma) $2.32MOther borrowers $4.87MUSDC $49.34MUSDC $2.7MAgua Global Carry Vault $2MUSD1 $33MUSD1 $33MUSDC (aguaUSDCgc market) $6.99MUSDC (wsrUSD market) $31.21MAUSD $19.86MAUSD (wsrUSD market) $19.2MPYUSD $3.97MSentora PRIME $3.97MRockaway USDC $3.9MUnborrowed $24.74MWLFI $7.1MUSD1 $3.62MUSDC $3.72MwsrUSD $48.96MWLFIcx $3.03MaguaUSDCgc $6.14MPRIME $2.89MUnborrowed $24.74M

Top Borrowers

The reserve earns its yield by lending to these counterparties. If their positions deteriorate faster than liquidations can clear them, the loss lands on the collateral backing the reserve — health factors near 1.0 are the early warning.

#
Borrower
Exposure
Total Borrow
Worst HF
Risk
Chains
Collateral
1
0x086e…e327
$19.36M
$53.05M
1.00
high
Monad
Monad
Ethereum
Ethereum
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
syrupUSDC
syrupUSDC
2
0x435b…b470
$17.27M
$17.27M
1.00
high
Monad
Monad
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
3
0x5be9…7dbb
$12.22M
$204.74M
2.71
low
Ethereum
Ethereum
WLFI
WLFI
USDC
USDC
WETH
WETH
mETH
mETH
4
0xab0d…c0ae
$11.02M
$19.52M
1.00
high
Monad
Monad
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
USDe
USDe
5
0x44a6…5fad
$3.36M
$41.74M
3.82
low
Ethereum
Ethereum
WLFI
WLFI
6
0xdc38…0d4e
$3.03M
$28.11M
2.26
low
Ethereum
Ethereum
WLFIcx
WLFIcx
7
0x81a4…49c9
$1.76M
$1.8M
1.01
high
Monad
Monad
aguaUSDCgc
aguaUSDCgc
8
0xcf7e…c904
$1.39M
$1.42M
1.45
moderate
Monad
Monad
aguaUSDCgc
aguaUSDCgc
9
0xd33b…17fe
$1.29M
$1.32M
1.45
moderate
Monad
Monad
aguaUSDCgc
aguaUSDCgc
10
0x4768…c9b2
$854.5K
$872.1K
1.45
moderate
Monad
Monad
aguaUSDCgc
aguaUSDCgc
11
0xbCd1…8eE0
$732.51K
$172.91M
2.01
low
Ethereum
Ethereum
cbBTC
cbBTC
12
0x1Cab…f945
$652.22K
$30.48M
1.44
moderate
Ethereum
Ethereum
PRIME
PRIME
13
0x7c76…7B69
$651.2K
$30.43M
1.15
high
Ethereum
Ethereum
PRIME
PRIME
14
0x7a27…e9bc
$631.69K
$634.22K
1.00
high
Monad
Monad
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
15
0x6cc6…c4bd
$469.39K
$6.24M
1.65
low
Monad
Monad
savUSD
savUSD
16
0x902c…fb09
$463.04K
$464.89K
1.00
high
Monad
Monad
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
17
0x1cb4…8894
$459.79K
$461.63K
1.00
high
Monad
Monad
wsrUSD
wsrUSD
18
0xb20a…6b50
$443.29K
$452.42K
1.45
moderate
Monad
Monad
aguaUSDCgc
aguaUSDCgc
19
0xc468…4ca6
$409.33K
$38.63M
1.02
high
Monad
Monad
USDe
USDe
20
0x95d7…6b78
$408.9K
$6.7M
1.15
high
Monad
Monad
savUSD
savUSD
1–20 of 200

Concentration

How concentrated the exposure is — across the collateral assets backing it, and across borrowing counterparties. Shares here are of the collateral exposure above — like that table, they don’t include the direct holdings or unborrowed reserve, so they read higher than shares of the whole reserve (the RWA callout below).

Collateral Concentration
Diversified · HHI below 1,500Moderately concentrated · HHI 1,500 – 2,500Highly concentrated · HHI above 2,500Highly concentrated · HHI above 2,5001,5002,500010,0003,537concentrated
Effective collaterals How many equal-size collaterals would match this concentration score (10,000 ÷ score). A lower count means more of the value sits with a few large collaterals.
2.8
Largest collateral
wsrUSD · 57.8%

How the exposure is spread across the collateral assets borrowers post — heavier reliance on a single collateral pushes the score up.

Borrower Concentration
Diversified · HHI below 1,500Diversified · HHI below 1,500Moderately concentrated · HHI 1,500 – 2,500Highly concentrated · HHI above 2,5001,5002,500010,0001,358diversified
Borrowers
201
Effective borrowers How many equal-size borrowers would match this concentration score (10,000 ÷ score). A lower count means more of the value sits with a few large borrowers.
7.4
Largest position
22.8%

How the exposure is spread across borrowing counterparties. Pool-based protocols (e.g. Aave) can't be broken down per borrower, so an entire pool counts as a single position — the score likely overreports true counterparty concentration.

Gauge key. Scores are Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) concentration scores, explained under the Portfolio gauges in the previous section:

  • Below 1,500 diversified
  • 1,500 – 2,500 moderately concentrated
  • Above 2,500 highly concentrated
RWA Exposure
PRIME
PRIME

2.64% of the reserve is exposed to PRIME

PRIME (Staked wYLDS) is an on-chain RWA token: tokenized exposure to a Figure Technologies warehouse lending facility — short-duration, asset-backed credit (HELOCs [home-equity lines of credit] awaiting securitization) carried at ~$1 NAV (~$407M total asset value). The credit is originated and serviced off-chain.

PRIME to USDC redemption is not instant. It is a two-phase on-chain flow — RequestRedeem moves shares to Pending, where they stop earning yield (an unbonding period), then CompleteRedeem returns USDC once the payout pool is funded. Per Hastra’s integration guide a redemption "remains pending until the Redeem Vault is liquid"; no settlement SLA or maximum pending duration is published.

Redemptions can be paused if a de-peg or exploit is detected, and asset-backed credit is slow to unwind under stress. So the reserve’s unborrowed, liquid balance — not PRIME redemption — is the first-line redemption buffer.

Of this, $2.89M is collateral posted by borrowers — 3.41% of the collateral exposure. The share of reserve reads lower because it also counts the direct holdings and unborrowed reserve.

PRIME exposure $2.89M
Share of reserve 2.64%
Unborrowed reserve $24.74M

The reserve holds $24.74M unborrowed and liquid — a first-line redemption buffer that does not depend on PRIME redemption. That matters precisely because PRIME is slow to unwind under stress.

rwa.xyz — PRIMEHastra integration guide

Yield & Equity

How the reserve’s return is split between wsrUSD holders — the senior claim, paid the savings rate first — and DAM, the protocol’s equity token, which keeps the spread and funds the incentive program.

What is DAM?

DAM is the protocol equity and governance token of Reservoir — the residual claim on the economics of the rUSD system. wsrUSD and DAM sit on opposite sides of the same balance sheet: wsrUSD is the depositor side, a senior claim paid the savings rate first and redeemable at par; DAM is the shareholder side, keeping whatever the deployed reserve earns above that rate and absorbing the cost of growing the system.

Value reaches DAM through two channels: buybacks — Reservoir commits up to 50% of monthly protocol net revenue to buying DAM on the open market, with all repurchased DAM held in treasury (per Reservoir’s DAM Buyback Program) — and incentive spend, DAM distributed via Merkl campaigns on top of native yield to deepen rUSD liquidity. A wsrUSD holder's yield does not depend on DAM's price, but the spread DAM captures funds the protocol standing behind the savings rate. The figures below measure that trade: what the reserve earns above the savings rate, what the incentive program costs, and the net between them.

Yield Structure savings rate vs deployed-portfolio return

wsrUSD savings rate owed to holders
6.00%
Reserve deployed APY what the portfolio earns
7.38%
paid to wsrUSD holders protocol spread · +1.38%

The reserve deploys $109.5M of claims into yield venues. Holders are owed the savings rate; everything the portfolio earns above it is protocol revenue — the margin that ultimately backs the DAM equity token above.

Key facts
Type Equity tokenClaim Residual (equity)Issuer Reservoir
Token
DAM
governance + protocol equity
Buybacks
≤ 50% net revenue
open market · held in treasury
Annual revenue
$1.51M
Incentive spend
$196.42K/yr
Net program PnL
$1.31M/yr
annualized revenue − incentive cost
TGE
Aug 18, 2025
Portfolio APY + Merkl campaign reads

Program Economics 2 active campaigns

Annual Revenue $1.51M +1.38% spread × $109.5M reserve
Annual DAM Cost $196.42K $538.13/day via Merkl
Net (Rev − Cost) $1.31M incentives pay for themselves
Rev / Cost 7.68× break-even at 6.18% deployed APY

Active Incentive Campaigns live Merkl campaigns paying DAM rewards on top of native yield

Target Vault
Chain
Action
Share
Steakhouse Reservoir USDC V2
Ethereum
Ethereum
Ethereum
Supply
1.44%
$12.97M
$512.5
$187.06K
95%
Steakhouse Reservoir USDC
Ethereum
Ethereum
Ethereum
Supply
1.62%
$578.24K
$25.63
$9.35K
5%

Revenue vs Cost History annualized run-rates · 191 points

$0$5.0M$10.0MFeb 12Apr 1May 19Jul 8Sep 22
Feb 12 Revenue $572K DAM Cost $2.07M Net −$1.50M
RevenueDAM CostNet positiveNet negative

Cumulative Profit and Loss (PnL) realized net since first capture

−$600K−$400K−$200K$0Feb 12Apr 1May 19Jul 8Sep 22
Feb 12 Cumulative −$1K
Accrued loss run-rates integrated across every capture

Mint / Redeem

How dollars enter and leave the underlying rUSD reserve at par — PSM liquidity, the redeem buffer behind instant exits, and the primary-market flow they carry.

Mint / redeem path
USDC
USDT
USD1
USDC · USDT · USD1 depositor pays in
P PSM swap at par
rUSD
rUSD liquid dollar
srUSD
wsrUSD
srUSD / wsrUSD save to earn
PSM Liquidity Mint fee Cap Status
USDC
USDC
$0 None None active
USDT
USDT
$0 None None active
USD1
USD1
$0 None None active
Redeem buffer
$75,000 fill target
last refill · Sep 22, 17:43 UTC
Live PSM balance $0
Fill target $75,000
Target history · 22 updates
$0$500KFeb 6Mar 16Apr 23May 31Jul 8Aug 15Sep 22
Feb 6 Fill target $250K
The buffer is intentionally thin and cycles both ways through Steakhouse Financial-curated Morpho vaults: when the PSM holds more than its fill target, the controller deploys the excess into the vault(s) to earn yield; when redemptions drain the PSM below target, an automated driver redeems from the same vault(s) and returns the USDC to the PSM — so the live balance cycles between near-empty and full. The manager moves the target itself as redemption demand shifts.

Primary-Market Flow 229 days · redemptions proxied by buffer refills, mints by deployments

$19.9M$0−$15.5MFeb 6May 31Sep 22
Feb 6 Redeemed $1.43M · 6× Deployed $0 · 0× Buffer target $250K
Redeemed — pulled back from adapters ($356.51M total) Deployed — pushed out to adapters ($493.96M total)
Buffer adapters · where parked liquidity earns
  • Steakhouse USDC Steakhouse Financial · 590 refills 69.20% whitelisted
  • Steakhouse Prime USDC Steakhouse Financial · 1,247 refills 30.79% whitelisted
Key facts
Mint At parRedeem InstantBuffer Automated
Mint fee
None (at par)
srUSD redeem fee
1.60 bps
PSM liquidity (live)
$0
Buffer target
$75,000
Buffer refills
1,837
Liquid rUSD
$307,106
srUSD price
1.1614
On-chain reads + Reservoir analytics

PSM, savings-module and buffer state read on-chain · flow from full event scan

Bridging

wsrUSD and rUSD are issued on Ethereum and travel cross-chain as LayerZero Omnichain Fungible Tokens (OFT) — locked on Ethereum and minted 1:1 on each destination, so the cross-chain supply stays unified. The bridge integration is independently audited (auditor shown above), and the destination set below is read directly from the adapter’s on-chain peers() mapping.

Bridge LayerZero OFT
Destination chains 20
Audited by Halborn
Issued on Ethereum

Destination chains

On-chain LayerZero OFT peers — where wsrUSD is minted cross-chain, sized by amount.

Chain
Minted (wsrUSD)
Value
Share
Monad
Monad
Monad
43.81M
$48.15M
85.49%
Pharos
Pharos
Pharos
6.1M
$6.7M
11.90%
Sei
Sei
Sei
1.34M
$1.47M
2.61%

On-chain OFT peers() reads (wsrUSD OFT Adapter) + Reservoir audit docs (docs.reservoir.xyz)

Listings

Markets that accept wsrUSD as collateral, and the terms on which they list it.

wsrUSD as collateral $21.0M
Loan liquidity $18.8M
Market
Chain
Market size
Borrowed
Utilization
LLTV
Supply APY
Borrow APY
wsrUSD / USDC
Ethereum
Ethereum
$12.68M
$11.48M
90.55%
94.50%
5.63%
6.24%
wsrUSD / USDC
Pharos
Pharos
$6.63M
$6.01M
90.71%
91.50%
3.68%
4.06%
wsrUSD / PYUSD0
Sei
Sei
$1.71M
$1.32M
77.18%
91.50%
2.94%
3.83%
wsrUSD / AUSD
Monad
Monad
$522.66
$522.66
100.00%
86.00%
67.52%
67.52%
wsrUSD / USDC
Ethereum
Ethereum
$347.7
$321.37
92.43%
91.50%
7.10%
7.70%
wsrUSD / USD1
Monad
Monad
$254.92
$20.64
8.10%
91.50%
0.18%
2.23%
wsrUSD / USDT
Ethereum
Ethereum
$137.38
$136.72
99.52%
94.50%
294.17%
296.79%
wsrUSD / rUSD
Ethereum
Ethereum
$59.45
$59.45
100.00%
98.00%
0.91%
0.91%

Due Diligence Coming soon

A written assessment across the core risk dimensions — mechanism, smart contract, counterparty, market and oracle — with the reasoning behind each.

The assessment narratives are being finalised.

Data provenance

Figures resolved from the latest rusd-portfolio snapshot — as of 9/22/2026, 6:00:02 PM. Static facts (manager, identity, due-diligence) are attested; gaps are shown as "Not disclosed" rather than estimated.

Is there another asset you’d like us to cover? Request a Report